|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a Department of
Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of
Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 3, I-16132 Genoa, Italy, b Posture and Movement Laboratory, Division of
Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Institute of
Veruno, "Salvatore Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, I-28010 Veruno (NO),
Italy
Correspondence to: Professor Marco Schieppati, Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV 3, I-16132 Genoa, Italy. Telephone 0039 10 3538190; fax 00390 10 3538194.
Received 17
March 1998 and in revised form 20 October 1998;
Accepted 3
November 1998
OBJECTIVES AND
METHOD
The relation between body sway recorded
through a stabilometric platform and the subjective report of
steadiness was studied in 20 young and 20 elderly subjects and 20 neuropathic and 20 parkinsonian patients standing upright. The trials
were performed under two stances (feet apart, feet together) and two
visual conditions (eyes open, eyes closed). At the end of each trial,
subjects scored their performance on a scale from 10 (complete
steadiness) to 0 (fall).
RESULTS
In all
subjects, independently of the stance conditions, the larger the body
sway the smaller the reported score. The function best fitting this
relation was linear when sway was expressed on a logarithmic scale. The
scoring reproducibility proved high both within and across subjects.
Despite the different body sways and scores recorded under the
different visual and postural conditions (eyes closed >eyes open, feet
together>feet apart) in all groups of subjects and patients, the
slopes of the relations between sway and score were broadly
superimposable. In the normal subjects, the scores were slightly higher
during eyes open than eyes closed trials for corresponding body sways.
This was interpreted as a sign of perception of greater stability when
vision was allowed. Parkinsonian patients swayed to a similar extent as
normal subjects, and their scores were accordingly similar, both with
eyes open and eyes closed. Neuropathic patients swayed to a larger
extent than normal subjects, and their scores were matched
appropriately. Although the slope of their relation with
eyes closed was not different from that of normal
subjects, with eyes open it was steeper and
similar to that with eyes closed, suggesting
that these patients did not feel more stable when they could take
advantage of vision.
CONCLUSIONS
The
subjective evaluation of body sway, irrespective of stance condition,
age, neuropathy, and basal ganglia disease, reflects the actual sway,
and is inversely proportional to the logarithm of the sway value. The
remarkable similarity of the relation between score and sway across the
various groups of subjects with eyes closed indicates a common mode of
sway evaluation, possibly based on integration of several sensory
inputs. All groups except neuropathic patients seem to take advantage
of the redundancy of the inputs. Basal ganglia integrity does not seem
to have a role in the evaluation of sway.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schmid, A. Nardone, A. M. De Nunzio, M. Schmid, and M. Schieppati Equilibrium during static and dynamic tasks in blind subjects: no evidence of cross-modal plasticity Brain, August 1, 2007; 130(8): 2097 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Maurer, T. Mergner, J. Xie, M. Faist, P. Pollak, and C. H. Lucking Effect of chronic bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation on postural control in Parkinson's disease Brain, May 1, 2003; 126(5): 1146 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Morasso and M. Schieppati Can Muscle Stiffness Alone Stabilize Upright Standing? J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1622 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |